WSJ: Apple going to CES 2010. Reality: Nope.

This week Gary Shapiro, chief exec of of the CEA (the trade group which puts on CES, and, full disclosure, for which I sometimes consult) held a private dinner with journalists in San Francisco. According to Dow Jones / WSJ reporter Ben Charny (whose first Google result is this page on shoddy journalism), a juicy morsel was revealed: “Apple plans to attend the show’s 2010 version, marking the first time in memory the Cupertino, Calif., consumer-electronics giant will be there.” Very interesting, indeed.

Unfortunately, it’s also specious and flatly wrong. I was seated directly across from Gary, and present for the entire conversation, wherein a dozen or so other journos chatted with with him and one another. When asked about the CEA’s ongoing contact with Jobs, Gary joked that every once in a while Steve might even return his email — to which we all laughed knowingly. Yep, that’s our Steve. Shapiro went on to mention that Apple was a great and long-standing supporter of the efforts of the CEA, but that their only direct involvement was sending a check each year to pay their membership dues.

At no point did Gary even remotely imply that Apple would be present at a future CES — let alone state flatly that Apple “will be there” in 2010. In fact, at one point, someone asked if, hypothetically, Apple did want to attend CES, whether the CEA could accommodate them. Gary said flatly that if pressed, they might be able to come up with a small 2,000 square foot booth, but they couldn’t do anything, say, Microsoft-sized on such short notice. Bottom line, though is that if Gary had even gotten remotely close implying Apple would be at CES, this shoddily sourced piece by Charny wouldn’t have been the earliest story with the scoop nearly 24 hours after the fact — laptops have would been immediately out for reports filed from the dinner table.

Now, I’m not saying Apple won’t be there. But Gary and the CEA certainly never said or implied that they would, and Charny certainly didn’t cite any other sources. Maybe by “Apple plans to attend” Charny meant one of Apple’s 32,000 employees would happen to be in Vegas next January. Of course, the greatest irony of this little dinner was was the lively debate at the end of the evening sparked by one particular old school BusinessWeek journalist who laid claim that tech blogs like Engadget publish first and ask questions later. Right.

Ryan Block is editor emeritus of Engadget, and co-founder of the recently-launched gdgt.

Filed under:

WSJ: Apple going to CES 2010. Reality: Nope. originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments



iPhone 3.0 beta firmware FAQ

While most people would probably agree that 3.0 doesn’t represent a revolutionary upgrade for iPhone users, it’s still large (and interesting) enough to warrant tons of questions, which we’ve been collecting to answer in a FAQ about the beta. Feel free to submit some more below! Just remember that just about anything can change between now and the final launch of 3.0 — it is a beta, after all.

So, how do I get this thing?
Well, unfortunately you need to be part of the developer program (which costs $99).

Whatevs, I just got it off of BitTorrent!
Okay, but it may not work. Your iPhone’s unique ID must be authorized for the 3.0 upgrade, and Apple checks that. So until someone cracks the 3.0 beta firmware image, you have to be a registered developer, or know somebody who can hook you up, pretty much.

How did installation go? From Miqal
Running it on a non-jailbroken device, it went smoothly. Took about as much time as your traditional restore. Just be warned: from what I’ve been hearing, once you go to 3.0, you can’t go back to 2.0. (Apple must have changed some of the baseband firmware or something, no real surprise.)

How’s performance been? I heard it’s really sluggish.
Actually, it’s been pretty good for me so far! Spotlight is actually faster than I expected and the rest of the common interactions feels the same as 2.2. I’m going to continue to keep an eye out for issues, but so far things have been humming along nicely. [Interestingly, Nilay, Ross, and Chris have all reported occasional slowness, proof that Ryan's zen-like patience is a virtue. -Ed.]

Do all of your apps sync? Do they work okay? From Kwarren and davidiom
So far, yes, I haven’t seen anything really go missing. 3.0 isn’t a fundamental architectural change, so I don’t think most apps need to be re-worked to function. Granted, there have been a few apps which have definitely given me some trouble when running in 3.0 (like the Peanut Butter Jelly Time! app — don’t you judge me), but so far I’ve run into very few problems and apps have been working mostly without much issue. As always, with something like this your mileage may vary.

Continue reading iPhone 3.0 beta firmware FAQ

Filed under:

iPhone 3.0 beta firmware FAQ originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Apple MacBook aluminum and glass super-shiny hands-on

Filed under:

digg_url = ‘http://digg.com/apple/Apple_MacBook_aluminum_and_glass_super_shiny_hands_on_2′; We just got our grubby, oily hands all over this pristine, all glass and aluminum MacBook. We sullied it on your behalf, but our initial impressions mostly positive: it’s small, incredibly, ridiculously solid feeling, and we actually don’t hate the all-clicking trackpad much at all. (If your thumb muscle memory makes you click at the bottom where the button used to be, it works and feels pretty much the same.) Of course, the glare of the glass screen is a MAJOR issue for us, and will be pretty much forever. There’s just no way we’ll be able to love it, so our eyes will be peeled for after-market add-ons to cut that down a bit. But in terms of the rest, it’s pretty clear this is the best MacBook — and best mainstream consumer laptop — Apple’s made to date.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Engadget Cares: save us from Apple’s groundbreaking, developer-shackling App Store

Filed under:

Engadget editor-at-large and gdgt co-founder Ryan Block contributes Engadget Cares, a friendly advice column for the people who make your technology.

It’s not hard to argue that the App Store’s inspired success for the mobile software world, with over 100 million programs downloaded on only a few million phones in just a matter of months. Palm, Nokia, Microsoft must all be simmering (and understandably so). But Apple, if you’re having trouble getting buy-in from passionate developers with a serious creative vision for iPhone apps beyond the dozens of me-too calculators and to-do lists — and you know you are — the writing’s on the wall, and you’re the one who put it there.

But it’s not just about the draconian SDK agreement (which we’ll get to in a minute), or the uncertainty that runs through every developer — large and small — as they wonder whether you’ll will give the all-important thumbs-up to the app they’ve just invested all that blood / sweat / tears / money into (we’ll get to that, too). What seems to the rest of us like nefarious intent may simply be Apple coming to grips with its own successes by reacting with the same kneejerk response it plies to most everything else: control and micromanagement.

Let’s rewind for a moment though, and go back to what Steve said at this Spring’s iPhone roadmap event, where the SDK was introduced for the first time. As Steve’s introduction reached its crescendo, he excitedly declared, “The developers and us have the same exact interest, which is to get as many apps out in front of as many iPhone users as possible,” but “there are going to be some apps we’re not going to distribute: porn, malicious apps, apps that invade your privacy…” The slide listed “malicious,” “illegal,” “porn,” “privacy,” “bandwidth hog,” and “unforeseen.” Ah, unforeseen — glorious wiggle room. I suppose “apps that might compete with our own” wouldn’t have gone over as well with the crowd. Read on.

Continue reading Engadget Cares: save us from Apple’s groundbreaking, developer-shackling App Store

Permalink | Email this | Comments

iPod touch 2G – first hands-on

Filed under: ,

digg_url = ‘http://digg.com/apple/iPod_touch_2G_first_hands_on’; We just got some hands-on time with the new iPod touch, and we’re really feeling this one. Jury’s still out on the new nano, but the second-gen touch is a marked improvement over the first gen model. The WiFi antenna looks much better integrated, the speaker doesn’t sound like complete trash despite not even having any speaker holes, and the thing is crazy thin. Like, really, really thin.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Apple event for next Tuesday, the 9th

Filed under: ,

Looks like that Apple event for the Tuesday, the 9th of this month is on. We know it’ll be new iPods (they always do iPods for the holidays), but hopefully they’ll have a little something special for us. Go on, hit the comments and get speculating.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Engadget Cares: The state of Palm – checking in a year later

Filed under:

Outgoing Engadget editor-in-chief Ryan Block contributes Engadget Cares, a friendly advice column for the people who make your technology.

Hard to believe, but it’s been a year and a day since Peter, Josh, and I published our intervention letter to Palm, wherein we rattled off a number of (admittedly unsolicited) suggestions on how we thought they might best turn things around at a time when Microsoft, RIM, and Apple were really eating into their slice of the smartphone pie.

Palm CEO Ed Colligan took the time to publicly reply, letting everyone know that he “forwarded [our letter] to [Palm's] entire executive staff and many others at Palm have read it. …We are attacking almost every challenge [Engadget] noted, so stay tuned.” When the dust settled, we were cautiously optimistic, if not a little hopeful.

In some ways that letter inspired Engadget Cares. And since it’s my last day here at Engadget as editor-in-chief and all, it seems only appropriate to check in on things and see whether Palm really did “attack every challenge” from a year ago. Read on.

Continue reading Engadget Cares: The state of Palm – checking in a year later

Permalink | Email this | Comments

i.engadget.com – Engadget for your iPhone or iPod touch

Filed under:

For obvious reasons, we’re not really big believers in optimizing Engadget for individual devices or platforms. Despite the unrelenting number of requests for an iPhone-optimized version of Engadget, we thought we’d let Apple stand by its whole “the real internet in your pocket” thing. And then we ran the numbers. We could hardly believe it.

So far in 2008, the iPhone, iPhone 3G, and iPod touch account for some 95.8% of all mobile views on the site. We’re not even kidding. It’s pretty hard to argue with something like that, so we’re rolling out a new beta version of Engadget optimized for the iPhone at i.engadget.com. (Don’t worry, we’ll still be keeping m.engadget.com active, too.) Please feel free to let us know what you think in comments!

Oh, and for the stats nerds in the audience, you can check out Engadget’s mobile device breakdown after the break.

Continue reading i.engadget.com – Engadget for your iPhone or iPod touch

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Segway hits car at full speed, results unsurprisingly painful looking

Filed under:

Our Deutsche is a little rusty, but Spiegel’s got a hard-hitting, um, sounding story on Segway safety — specifically regarding what happens when one hits a stationary object or falls off of one while riding it at full speed. Hey Spiegel, why don’t you try the same test with one of those bicycle contraptions we hear Europeans are so in love with? We have a feeling you might be slightly more horrified by the results.

[Via AutoblogGreen, thanks Nate]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Microsoft prepping Feature Pack for Storage with Blu-ray for XP and Vista

Filed under:

We’re not going to get back into the Xbox 360 + Blu-ray debate, but Sony’s HD format is clearly on Microsoft’s collective mind, as it’s begun prepping a new Windows add-on dubbed Feature Pack for Storage. The kit’s set to contain modules for portable drive recognition and restriction, ICCD and CCID Smartcard drivers, but most notably an image mastering API for Blu-ray that enables “master style optical burning on Blu-Ray [sic] media.” Expect it soon on Windows Vista, XP SP2+, Server 2008, and Server 2003 SP1+ — or really soon if you get in on the beta.

[Via ZDnet]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

  


Your Ad Here